Login | Sign up | Help
 
  What's New? Archive Write Something  
      
Saturday, July 19, 2008     5   0    Translate this:              

The Great Soy Debate - What's The Big Fuss?

submitted by equanimity
Vegetarians and vegans are often exposed to a plethora of soy products, ranging from tofu to "Tofurkey". Is soy too much of a good thing? What's the great debate about health benefits of soy?

Many anti-soy researchers including Dr. Mercola, support the view that soy is not a magical health food. Are they correct? After all, these guys do have PhDs and fancy "doctor" labels.

So, soy oh so soy, what's the big fuss about?

It turns out, Dr. Mercola and other folks are largely behind the meat industry and have financial interests rather than public health. Dr. Mercola, for example, claims that soy is "dangerous" and instead recommends many animal products such as his "krill pills" on his website. Weston-Price Foundation, or those associated with the groups like Dr. Kaayla Daniel, are also anti-vegetarian, pro-meat & dairy. Theses anti-soyers all make negative and incorrect comments about vegetarianism and soy.

And you know what? This sort of anti-soy movement (especially on the web) is hugely done by the meat/dairy industry. After all, so much public misinformation is out there, why not confuse the public even more? Of course, the deep pockets of the meat and dairy industry can afford to spend a few millions of dollars to pour into this type of movement, to fuel the public misinformation and move the soy products into the public "fear" zone, just like the FDA did with tomatoes.



Personally, I take on the following view on the controversy over soy, because it cites many reliable sources and studies.

What about Soy?

In summary, the following are noteworthy:



- Since the medical research began accumulating, affirming that soy consumption reduced heart disease and cancer risk, that it lengthened lives and enhanced their quality, and that it provided an almost ideal protein to substitute for animal proteins. Demand for soy skyrocketed as the evidence of soy's health benefits kept accumulating.

- Sally Fallon & Mary Enig claims that the above is a "tragic mistake" because soybeans contain "toxins" or "antinutrients. Why?

- Fallon & Enig's accusation is based on a 1985 study that showed soy increases the risk of pancreatic cancer in rats, when fed with 100% soy diet.

- However, researchers with the National Cancer Institute point out that rats are extraordinarily sensitive to dietary protease inhibitors such as those found in soy. Humans do not have this kind of sensitivity.



- In The China Study, rats fed with 20% soy protein decreased their chances of getting cancer by 100%, even when injecting them with powerful carcinogens. By contrast, rats fed with 20% animal protein (casein, which is milk protein) were all dead after 100 weeks.

- The China Study proved that the similar happened in humans, after following 6,500 adults' dietary patterns and their diagnosed disease patterns in 20 years.

- No such intensive research has been done on 100% soy diet on humans. Personally, I highly doubt that anyone is willing to eat 100% soybeans for 20 years, however.



- Fallon & Enig's accusations that "soyfoods block calcium and cause vitamin D deficiencies" are not provided with any supporting evidence. Westerners have higher rates of osteoporosis than their Asian counterparts who consume more soy products such as tofu, rather than meat/dairy products such as cheese.

- According to the Nutrition Committee of the American Heart Association officially recommends the inclusion of 25 grams or more of soy protein, with its associated phytochemicals intact, in the daily diet as a means of promoting heart health.

- Soy pooh pooh-ers say that lowered cholesterol levels, even those lowered by diet are, get this, dangerous. Wow!

- However, in the past 30 years, everything that has been learned about heart disease and cholesterol has a strongly high correlation in the medical science. Charles Glueck, M.D. director of the University of Cincinnati Lipid Research Center, noted: "For every one percent reduction in total blood cholesterol level, there is a two percent reduction of heart disease risk."

- Vegetarian diets that include moderate amounts of soy have consistently shown profound benefits for pregnancy and lactation, including much lower levels of the toxic chemicals that typically concentrate higher on the food chain in meat, fish and dairy products.

- Anti-soyers say that soy is high in estrogen, and that soy formulas are "birth control pills for babies."

- A major study published in the August, 2001, Journal of the American Medical Association found that infants fed soy formula grow to be just as healthy as those raised on cow's milk formulas.



- For adults however, studies found that higher consumption animal protein such as cow's milk, increases the level of blood hormones such as estrogen. This is quite the opposite of what the anti-soy movement claims! Doesn't that mean cow's milk and animal foods are actually the birth control pills for adults?!



- Fallon & Egnig, insist that only with the regular consumption of lard, butter and other full fat dairy products, and beef, can people derive the nutrients they need to be healthy. Joseph Mercola, for example, a Chicago osteopath who has authored a series of vehemently anti-soy articles that have circulated widely on the internet, is an ardent advocate of eating beef, chicken, turkey, ostrich, and other meats.

- Other anti-soy crusaders, most notably the U.S. dairy industry, clearly have a financial agenda. In recent years, the dairy industry has been waging war against soymilk, i.e. claiming that the term "milk" should only be used for cow's milk and not for other milk alternatives.


...



Of course, not all soy products must be healthy for us, but many of them are definitely better than drug-induced cow's milk and meat products. Furthermore, animal protein is a heavy contributor to many types of cancer, heart diseases, osteoporosis, and diabetes and I have personally seen it happening to my own family as well as other families. And that is one of my main reasons for going vegetarian.

At the same time, however, I'd also prefer to go with organic tofu and whole foods versus heavily processed products. This one very knowledgeable nutritionist who spoke at a world health festival in LA also talked about this issue briefly along with tips on nutrition, and I decided to follow her view as well. Here is a short article that summarizes her tips on how to disease-proof your diet:

How to disease proof your diet from World-Fest.

The China Study also uncovers pretty much everything that we need to know about nutrition and health in the scientific sense, including the emphasis on whole foods, plant-based diet. (For more information on The China Study, you may want to read here.)

So why yes, I will continue to be powered by tofu, thank you.
Share:                            
I agree with you. I think soy is very healthy for our bodies, I've been eating soy regularly for quite sometime, and I feel great.
by Ron, 2 years ago
"A diet high in meat and poultry may expose a man to hormones used in meat production that act like estrogen in the body. Estrogen is a potent inhibitor of testosterone production as are prolonged periods of high stress."

http://www.seekwellness.com/andropause/testosterone.htm
by eunice, 2 years ago
Wow, I thought soy is the thing that gives you estrogen. Guess not.
by TheGreatOne, 2 years ago
I also agree with you in that Asians are probably more adapted to eat soy.
by IronMan, 2 years ago
Plus, soymilk is better for the environment.

http://www.slate.com/id/2195690/
by eunice, 2 years ago
Saw a news article while I was working out about how it's dangerous to eat soy products right now. Not sure what that is about, does anyone know?
by Ron, 2 years ago
The news may have been linked to something like this: "Soy may decrease men's sperm count" - well, well, well, here, that's a pretty harsh for real men who eat soy...! What's the truth? Who is behind this study? Many questions can arise from such a controversial argument. Here's the truth. The study was done with many overweight and obese patients whose estrogen levels are already very high. Remember, animal protein increases blood hormone levels which increases estrogen in men.

Here's the full story:



Caution: headlines claiming “soy products may lower sperm count” do not tell the whole story. The small scale, preliminary study that Dr. Jorge Chavarro from the Harvard School of Public Health in Boston presented at the American Society for Reproductive Medicine was based on recollected intake of soyfoods and not on specific diets containing soyfoods. “This study is confounded by many issues, thus I feel the results should be viewed with a great deal of caution,” warned Dr. Tammy Hedlund, a researcher in prostate cancer prevention from the University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Department of Pathology. The research did not find a negative relationship between soy and sperm mobility or sperm quality, which are both key factors to fertility. The study also did not determine directly what other foods, medications, supplements, existing medical conditions, sexual activities or environmental factors may have directly affected the drop in sperm count.

Generations of Asians have regularly consumed soyfoods without fertility disorders, and Asian countries have prodigiously produced very healthy, highly functioning children for centuries. According to New Scientist, “Chavarro admits that many East Asian men consume much more soya than the participants in his trial and do not develop fertility problems. He speculates that his study found a link between soya and low sperm count because many of the participants were overweight or obese. Men with high levels of body fat produce more oestrogen than their slim counterparts."

Chavarro’s study conflicts with the large body of U.S. government and National Institute of Health-sponsored human and primate research, in which controlled amounts of isoflavones from soy were fed and no effect on quantity, quality or motility of sperm were observed. Upon hearing of Chavarro’s findings, Dr. Stephen Barnes, a pharmacologist at the University of Alabama at Birmingham, noted “This study is the first to find this correlation. The research on soy in men has not found a negative impact on male hormones but rather has suggested a preventive effect in prostate cancer.”

Learn the facts about healthy soyfoods. Studies have indicated soyfoods may lower cholesterol, may boost cognitive function and may protect against prostate cancer.


Source: Soyfoods.org

by equanimity, 2 years ago
Yep, that's exactly right.

Here's another knowledgeable nutritionist (PhD) who talks about soy:

Soy: What's the Big Deal?

by Dr. John Berardi and Ryan Andrews
by eunice, 2 years ago
Hi, Equanimity !

Je consomme du soja, solide ou liquide depuis 11 ans maintenant, et mes trois enfants en ont consommé depuis leur naissance, et ils sont toujours en bonne santé !

Ils ne sont jamais malade, même, alors, vive le soja, et les autres protéines végétales, pourvu qu'ils soient issus de production Biologique ( from Organic Food origin's ), et Sans O.G.M

Excellente journée à toi, et à tous tes lecteurs !
by jessee, 2 years ago
Say Something Here

somewhat related

How to Become A Vegetarian
submitted 2 years ago
Christianity and Vegetarianism
submitted 2 years ago
see more

popular tags

Please Enter Your Login Info
 
 
Forgot your password?
Copyright © 2008 Vegtaste. All rights reserved help |  terms and conditions |  contact us